In 2007, the Gambling Amendment Bill (2) was presented to Parliament, presenting several changes to the ways in which gaming is regulated in New Zealand. This week, the bill has finally seen some progress – but, it is being criticised by local community members. According to Scoop, The New Zealand First party has spoken out against the bill, stating that it would have a negative effect on small businesses and clubs across the country.
Since the bill would impose new costs and additional taxes on gaming, it could potentially hurt the bottom line of local venues that rely on pokie revenue to keep their businesses going.
“Additional costs and requirements are going to hit smaller businesses, local RSAs and sports clubs hardest,” says Clayton Mitchell, a spokesperson for New Zealand First. “Small businesses will be hit by a barrage of additional requirements which will effectively legislate them out of existence through a series of amendments to the Gambling Act”. One of the bill’s major points deals with self-exclusions.
Usually, players who ban themselves from gaming venues cannot enter the building at all. The bill would change this to allow them to enter the club but prohibit them from actually entering the gaming area. While this initially seems to benefit clubs by permitting self-excluded to continue spending money at the bar, it will result in additional costs for the venue owner as they will have to put more security systems in place.
Overall, the party is concerned that the bill will result in club closures across the country. Casinos, on the other hand, would be able to continue operating as they can certainly cover any additional costs that are a result of the bill. Mitchell continues: “Many small businesses and clubs may be forced to close while at the same time casinos that have the cash to pay the excessive charges will prosper.”
The bill will continue its third reading next week. We will keep you updated with further developments.
About the Author
